Rule 35 Examinations – Compelling Discovery

Re-Writing Nevada’s Rules of Civil Procedure, Part 8: Rule 35

Since I began this series, I was advised of proposed changes to Rule 35. One notable change is that the

If my experience in the last few years is at all typical, then the claims du jure are 1) Mild

Rule 35 examinations are a frequent topic, unnecessarily so in my opinion.[1] Locally, there is an assertion that a Rule

Personal injury plaintiffs anticipating surgery may commit spoliation if they have surgery before submitting to a Rule 35 exam. I

The argument de jour in opposing Rule 35 examination requests is to argue the examiner is “biased.” One prior post